Compact Underwater Electromagnetic Sensor with Internal Data Logging

Navy SBIR 25.1- Topic N251-050
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)
Pre-release 12/4/24   Opens to accept proposals 1/8/25   Closes 2/5/25 12:00pm ET    [ View Q&A ]

N251-050 TITLE: Compact Underwater Electromagnetic Sensor with Internal Data Logging

OUSD (R&E) CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Microelectronics

OBJECTIVE: Develop an Underwater Electromagnetic (UEM) sensor package that includes magnetic and electric field sensing, and internal data logging. The sensors need to be sensitive to small field variations, stable in underwater environments, and packaged in a compact design with self-contained data logging.

DESCRIPTION: Current UEM measurement systems on the market are typically bulky and are not designed to support simple transportation methods and ad-hoc stand-alone deployments. A majority of these systems are limited to specific sensors and the electronics supporting the measurement components have not been optimized for smaller form factors. Over the last decade, sensors and electronic improvements to power consumption and form factor could enable smaller sensor packages and increased endurance.

The end product of this SBIR topic will be a stand-alone compact UEM sensor that can be easily deployed and recovered in an ocean environment that can measure magnetic and electric fields. When deployed, the UEM sensor will land and operate from the seafloor. The UEM sensor is expected to be able to be deployed and collect data for up to 7 days.

The magnetic field sensing should be capable of collecting magnetic field in all three orthogonal vector components. The electric field sensing capability should also be capable of collecting electric field in all three orthogonal vectors components. The compact UEM sensor should also consist of a pressure sensor to enable post-processing of system depth during the data collection windows.

The UEM sensor should be programmable to enable delayed operations and allow for targeted data collection windows.

The UEM sensor should be packable into a 6.75" diameter cylinder and shall not exceed 80 inches in length. Upon deployment, the system can expand as required to support data collection operations and recovery.

The awardee will be expected to fabricate 3-5 prototype compact UEM sensors to test in the lab and on land to ensure all the capabilities are integrated, power consumption is verified, and data storage is adequate for the length of deployment. Additionally, the electric field and magnetic field measurement capabilities will be tested to ensure noise levels are satisfactory.

After lab testing is completed and noise levels are demonstrated, if satisfactory with U.S. Navy expectations, the next effort will be to deploy and test the compact UEM sensor at the South Florida Ocean Measurement Facility (SFOMF) in Dania Beach, FL to demonstrate the total system performance in an operational environment to achieve TRL 7. The sensor recoverability will also be demonstrated.

PHASE I: Define and develop a concept for a compact underwater UEM sensor with internal data logging that can meet the performance and the SWaP constraints listed in the Description. Perform modeling and simulation to provide initial assessment of concept performance. The Phase I Option, if exercised, includes the initial layout and capabilities description to build the unit in Phase II.

PHASE II: Develop and deliver 3-5 prototypes based on Phase I work for demonstration and validation. Three to five prototypes should be delivered during the Phase II for lab and field testing as identified in the Description. Additional testing as identified in the Description will be performed to demonstrate the total system performance in an operational environment. Sensor recoverability will also be demonstrated.

PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Assist the Navy in transitioning the technology to Navy use. The Navy would use these sensors as an alternative to collect UEM signature measurements of ships and submarines that don’t have operational measurement arrays available. The compact design and portability allow for low-cost, feasible shipping methods that could be rapidly deployed in various locations.

The sensors could also benefit civilian uses including geologic surveys of the ocean floor, ocean wave dynamics research, and other related areas of interest. Reducing sensor and acquisition noise, optimizing sensor battery life and data storage, and other issues would decrease maintenance costs of existing systems, providing additional feasibility for a variety of applications.

REFERENCES:

1. Spichak, Viacheslav V. "Advances in electromagnetic techniques for exploration, prospecting, and monitoring of hydrocarbon deposits." First Break, Volume 36, Issue 10, Oct 2018, p.75-81. https://www.earthdoc.org/content/journals/10.3997/1365-2397.n0129

2. Slater, Michael. "Oregon Wave Energy Trust. Electromagnetic Field Study: Summary of commercial electromagnetic field sensors for the marine environment." Oregon State University, ScholardArchive@OSU, July 8, 2017. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/technical_reports/db78tc64w

3. "Electromagnetic Field Effects on Marine Life." U.S. Offshore Wind Synthesis of Environmental Effects Research (SEER), December 2022. http://www.crmc.ri.gov/meetings/2022_1213semipacket/SEER_EMF_MarineLife.pdf

KEYWORDS: Compact Acquisition Systems; Underwater Electromagnetic Signatures; Magnetometers; Electropotential; Electric Field; Magnetic Field


** TOPIC NOTICE **

The Navy Topic above is an "unofficial" copy from the Navy Topics in the DoD 25.1 SBIR BAA. Please see the official DoD Topic website at www.dodsbirsttr.mil/submissions/solicitation-documents/active-solicitations for any updates.

The DoD issued its Navy 25.1 SBIR Topics pre-release on December 4, 2024 which opens to receive proposals on January 8, 2025, and closes February 5, 2025 (12:00pm ET).

Direct Contact with Topic Authors: During the pre-release period (December 4, 2024, through January 7, 2025) proposing firms have an opportunity to directly contact the Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) to ask technical questions about the specific BAA topic. Once DoD begins accepting proposals on January 8, 2025 no further direct contact between proposers and topic authors is allowed unless the Topic Author is responding to a question submitted during the Pre-release period.

DoD On-line Q&A System: After the pre-release period, until January 22, at 12:00 PM ET, proposers may submit written questions through the DoD On-line Topic Q&A at https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/submissions/login/ by logging in and following instructions. In the Topic Q&A system, the questioner and respondent remain anonymous but all questions and answers are posted for general viewing.

DoD Topics Search Tool: Visit the DoD Topic Search Tool at www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/ to find topics by keyword across all DoD Components participating in this BAA.

Help: If you have general questions about the DoD SBIR program, please contact the DoD SBIR Help Desk via email at [email protected]

Topic Q & A

1/10/25  Q. Q1: What is the estimated depth that the sensor will be located? (Ocean floor is variable)
Q2: What is the required sensitivity of the sensor?
Q3: Can you provide a FREE copy of the referenced material “Spichak, Viacheslav V. “Advances in electromagnetic techniques for exploration, prospecting, and monitoring of hydrocarbon deposits.” First Break, Volume 36, Issue 10, Oct 2018, p.75-81.”
Q4: Are they satisified with obtaining the data upon retrieving the sensor?
Q5: What frequency range / bandwidth is of interest for this application?
   A. A1: 525ft is the minimum, but up to 825 ft is desireable.
A2: We have been answering this question with respect to sensor noise levels in the time domain:
  • Electric Field: 10 uV/m pk-pk
  • Magnetic Field: 10 nT pk-pk
  • A3: We do not have access to a free copy of this material.
    A4: Yes, expecting obtaining the data after retrieving the sensor.
    A5: DC- 20 Hz
    1/2/25  Q. We have several questions about the requirements of this topic:
    1. What is the maximum depth at which the system will need to be operated?
    2. What are the required resolution and noise-floor levels for the collected data?
    3. How will the system be retrieved once it resurfaces? Should some sort of optical or radio beacon be used to share its location?
       A.
    1. 525ft is the minimum, but up to 825 ft is desirable.
    2. We have been answering this question with respect to sensor noise levels in the time domain:
        Electric Field: 10 uV/m pk-pk
        Magnetic Field: 10 nT pk-pk
    3. Expectation is that it will retrieved by hand with a small boat. A capability to locate the beacon upon surface would be desirable but that solution space is on the performer to propose.


    [ Return ]